[Ica-sdistandards] FW: ICC 2023 notification for paper 2906 - A review of the ICA model of stakeholders in a spatial data infrastructure (SDI)

[Antony Cooper]

Dear Members of the ICA's Commission on SDI and Standards

I am pleased to say that our paper has been accepted for the ICC 2023.

I am attaching the updated version of the paper, which includes Iwona's contributions.  I have also added a figure of all the subtypes, as requested by the first reviewer, and I trimmed down the text before the figure to accommodate it (I did not mark up these small changes).

The only unresolved issue is the comment by the first reviewer about the ordering of the references.  I sorted based on all the authors followed by the dates, but the reviewer expects them to be ordered by just the first author and then the dates.  What do you recommend?

The deadline for the revised version is 8 May 2023, but we do not have to wait that long.  Can you please send all your inputs by Thursday next week, 6 April 2023?

Thanks
Antony


-----Original Message-----
From: icc2023 at easychair.org <icc2023 at easychair.org> 
Sent: Friday, 17 March 2023 23:43
To: Antony Cooper <ACooper at csir.co.za>
Subject: ICC 2023 notification for paper 2906

Dear Antony Cooper,

We have the pleasure to inform you that your submission 2906 A review of the ICA model of stakeholders in a spatial data infrastructure (SDI) was accepted for an oral presentation at the International Cartographic Conference 2023, to be held in Cape Town from 13 to 18 August 2023. All presentations have to be delivered in English. 

Your paper will be published in the Advances in Cartography and GIScience of the ICA (eISSN 2570-2084) https://www.advances-in-cartography-and-giscience-of-the-ica.net/ 

Please revise the paper according to the reviewer comments and suggestions, and upload it in EasyChair by 8 May 2023. EasyChair will be open for uploading again by the end of March. 

Please pay attention to the following when revising your paper:
- Please do a final check to make sure that your paper, including the references, is correctly formatted according to the ICA templates. MS Word templates are available here  https://www.ica-conference-publications.net/ica_word_template.html and LaTex templates here https://www.ica-conference-publications.net/ica_latex_template.html.
- If necessary, please resize the figure(s) in your abstract so that the text is legible on an A4 printout.
- Make sure that figures are numbered and cited in the text, that all references are cited in the text and all citations listed in the references. 
- Papers should be at least 6 pages long, but not longer than eight pages.

The presenting author must register for the conference by 15 May 2023. Registration categories and fees are here https://icc2023.org/index.php/registration/, and click on this link to register https://evolve.eventoptions.co.za/register/31sticc2023/details. If the presenting author is not registered by the due date, we will unfortunately have to remove your presentation or poster from the  programme.

Please consider joining one of the pre-conference workshops https://icc2023.org/index.php/pre-conference-workshops/ - more information and workshop details will follow. For accommodation and tours, and any other information about the conference, please visit https://icc2023.org/. 

We are looking forward to seeing you in Cape Town later this year. Please don’t hesitate to contact us if you have any questions about the next steps. 

Regards,
Serena Coetzee and Azile Mdleleni scientific-committee at icc2023.org

SUBMISSION: 2906
TITLE: A review of the ICA model of stakeholders in a spatial data infrastructure (SDI)


----------------------- REVIEW 1 ---------------------
SUBMISSION: 2906
TITLE: A review of the ICA model of stakeholders in a spatial data infrastructure (SDI)
AUTHORS: Antony Cooper, Serena Coetzee, Harold Moellering, Petr Rapant, Joep Crompvoets, Jan Hjelmager, Tatiana Delgado and Adam Iwaniak

----------- Overall evaluation of the paper -----------
SCORE: 5 (accept)
----- TEXT:
The full paper reviews publications about the roles of stakeholders of spatial data infrastructures, in which the SDI commission's SDI formalisations have been used as a base reference, in order to further enhance the commission's model. The paper thus looks at a timespan of about 15 years of latest SDI development, which brings a wide perspective on the topic. Suggestions from the literature are itemized and discussed through systematically, and problems with stakeholder classifications are also taken into account, where negative stakeholders are an important addition. With all the stakeholder roles and their modifications presented, I miss an illustration gathering them together in relation to each other.
 
In the references, I see that reverse chronological order is used but Oliveira 2015 and 2016 do not follow that.
 
The paper is easy to suggest to be developed into a cartographic journal article.
----------- Originality/novelty of the paper -----------
SCORE: 4 (good)
----------- Potential interest to the ICA community -----------
SCORE: 5 (absolutely relevant and interesting)
----------- Proper documentation of related work in the paper -----------
SCORE: 4 (good)
----------- Correct use of English -----------
SCORE: 5 (excellent)
----------- Clarity of presentation in the paper -----------
SCORE: 5 (excellent)
----------- Reviewer confidence -----------
SCORE: 4 (high)



----------------------- REVIEW 2 ---------------------
SUBMISSION: 2906
TITLE: A review of the ICA model of stakeholders in a spatial data infrastructure (SDI)
AUTHORS: Antony Cooper, Serena Coetzee, Harold Moellering, Petr Rapant, Joep Crompvoets, Jan Hjelmager, Tatiana Delgado and Adam Iwaniak

----------- Overall evaluation of the paper -----------
SCORE: 6 (strong accept)
----- TEXT:
Through a review of the literature citing the ICAs formal models of SDI, the paper aims to offer improvements to the Enterprise Viewpoint through more detailed categories for defining stakeholders. The literature showed that this was a point of confusion for implementation and suggested improvements stand to make the model more functional and useable across the board. 

Relevant research is well cited.
----------- Originality/novelty of the paper -----------
SCORE: 4 (good)
----------- Potential interest to the ICA community -----------
SCORE: 4 (relevant and interesting)
----------- Proper documentation of related work in the paper -----------
SCORE: 5 (excellent)
----------- Correct use of English -----------
SCORE: 5 (excellent)
----------- Clarity of presentation in the paper -----------
SCORE: 5 (excellent)
----------- Reviewer confidence -----------
SCORE: 4 (high)


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Cooper et al - Review of ICA model of SDI stakeholders - ICC_2023_paper_2906 - revised - 20230327.docx
Type: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document
Size: 179986 bytes
Desc: Cooper et al - Review of ICA model of SDI stakeholders - ICC_2023_paper_2906 - revised - 20230327.docx
URL: <http://lazarus.elte.hu/pipermail/ica-sdistandards/attachments/20230327/7f73552b/attachment-0001.docx>