Generalization of O-maps
General aspects of
generalization
General aspects of
generalization
General aspects of
generalization
Workflow of Generalization
Workflow of Generalization
|
|
|
|
Purpose of a Foot O-map: |
|
An Orienteering map is topographic map
with additional information about hindrance, respectively about runnability. |
|
|
|
Purpose of a Sprint O-map: |
|
An Orienteering map is topographic map
with additional information about
|
Workflow of Generalization
|
|
|
|
Scale |
|
Size of a map ( not larger than A3) |
|
Source |
|
Photogrammetric basemap |
|
Planimetric basemap |
|
Map Reading |
|
Resolution of the viewers eyes (Limit
at 0.02 mm) |
|
Running, dense canopy of leaves, night
competitions |
Workflow of Generalization
|
|
|
|
Symbols topo-map o-map |
|
Line (black) on white paper 0.05
mm 0.14 mm |
|
Gab between two lines 0.25
mm 0.15 mm |
|
Square (side) 0.30
mm 0.50 mm |
|
Circle (diameter) 0.30 mm
0.80 mm |
|
Dot (diameter) 0.15
mm 0.30 mm |
|
Triangle (side) 1.00
mm 0.80 mm |
|
Dotted line 0.10mm 0.22
mm |
|
Color mosaic 4.0 mm2 0.51,0
mm2 |
Workflow of Generalization
|
|
|
|
Technical possibilities of reproduction |
|
|
|
Spot color printing (traditional
printing) |
|
Four color offset printing (CMYK) |
|
Laser printer |
|
Inkjet printer |
|
|
|
Demands from the course setters:
printing map and courses together!
Scale 1:10000 |
Workflow of Generalization
|
|
|
|
Selection (of features while other are
dropped) |
|
Appropriate and practicable map content: |
|
What can be added to greatest advantage and |
|
which elements have dubious significance for the
purpose of a map (e.g. rootstocks,
fallen trees)? |
|
Specification for Orienteering Maps (ISOM 2000) |
Workflow of Generalization
Workflow of Generalization
|
|
|
Classification: individual
characteristics grouped into classes for comprehension and ease of representation |
Workflow of Generalization
|
|
|
Classification: individual
characteristics grouped into classes for comprehension and ease of representation |
Workflow of Generalization
Workflow of Generalization
|
|
|
Simplification: |
|
The various fine structures of natural
terrain can never be fully represented like their reality. |
|
The best principles or rules cannot
guide the hand of the cartographer with certainty |
|
Good simplification needs a lot of
geographic and graphic judgment, as well as a lot of field experience |
Workflow of Generalization
|
|
|
Simplification: |
|
Line Smoothing (see also contour lines) |
|
|
Generalization of rocky areas
Generalization of rocky areas
Generalization of rocky areas
Generalization of rocky areas
Generalization of rocky areas
Generalization of rocky areas
Generalization of rocky areas
Generalization of rocky areas
Guidelines
for Generalization of rocky areas
Guidelines
for Generalization of rocky areas
Guidelines
for Generalization of rocky areas
Guidelines
for Generalization of rocky areas
Guidelines
for Generalization of rocky areas
Generalization of Contours
|
|
|
Contour lines are most import features
in the cartographic representation of a the terrain. |
|
|
|
With contour lines we represent a
surface, therefore we need either: |
|
|
|
hill shading (not suitable for O-maps) or |
|
a group of contour lines |
Generalization of Contours
Generalization of Contours
Generalization of Contours
|
|
|
With respect to the contour interval,
the contour lines are too poor in form and smoothed out too greatly |
Generalization of Contours
|
|
|
The contour lines show too much detail,
too much activity relative to the large interval |
Generalization of Contours
|
|
|
The detail form of the contour lines
and the interval are in good harmony with each other |
Generalization of Contours
|
|
|
|
The contour line image should present: |
|
A uniform overall treatment of the
terrain, which is fully interrelated |
|
|
|
Simplify the detailed form of contour
and emphasize and combine large forms |
|
Represent the type of the terrain by
emphasizing breaks in slopes |
|
Represent the terrain an adequate
contour line interval and line width |
|
Provide a certain level of accuracy of
the contour lines and other features |
Guidelines
for Generalization of Contours
|
|
|
1. A single line says very little;
therefore, one should not draw a single line without considering the line on
either side of it |
Guidelines
for Generalization of Contours
|
|
|
|
|
2. Small details which
are not reflected in closely neighboring contours should be smoothed out. |
|
|
|
Exceptions: |
|
A small knoll, a small depression or a
pit |
|
Flat
terrain |
|
|
Guidelines
for Generalization of Contours
|
|
|
2. Small details which
are not reflected in closely neighboring contours should be smoothed out. |
|
|
|
|
Guidelines
for Generalization of Contours
|
|
|
2. Small details which
are not reflected in closely neighboring contours should be smoothed out. |
|
|
|
|
Guidelines
for Generalization of Contours
|
|
|
3. Contour lines should never touch
each other, except in special cases like cliff and rock pillars |
Guidelines
for Generalization of Contours
|
|
|
4. Generalized contours lines should
not look like gently smoothed wavy lines, neither should appear jagged or
crooked |
Guidelines
for Generalization of Contours
|
|
|
5. Before beginning any generalization
of contour lines, one should draw significant sharply terrain crests or break
of slops as drawing guides lines |
Guidelines
for Generalization of Contours
Generalization of Contours
Generalization of Contours
Generalization of Contours
Generalization of Contours