|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purpose of a Foot O-map: |
|
An Orienteering map is topographic map with
additional information about hindrance, respectively about runnability. |
|
|
|
Purpose of a Sprint O-map: |
|
An Orienteering map is topographic map with
additional information about
|
|
|
|
|
|
Scale |
|
Size of a map ( not larger than A3) |
|
Source |
|
Photogrammetric basemap |
|
Planimetric basemap |
|
Map Reading |
|
Resolution of the viewers eyes (Limit at 0.02
mm) |
|
Running, dense canopy of leaves, night
competitions |
|
|
|
|
|
Symbols topo-map
o-map |
|
Line (black) on white paper 0.05 mm 0.14
mm |
|
Gab between two lines 0.25 mm 0.15 mm |
|
Square (side) 0.30 mm 0.50 mm |
|
Circle (diameter) 0.30 mm 0.80 mm |
|
Dot (diameter) 0.15 mm 0.30 mm |
|
Triangle (side) 1.00 mm 0.80 mm |
|
Dotted line 0.10mm 0.22 mm |
|
Color mosaic 4.0 mm2 0.51,0 mm2 |
|
|
|
|
|
Technical possibilities of reproduction |
|
|
|
Spot color printing (traditional printing) |
|
Four color offset printing (CMYK) |
|
Laser
printer |
|
Inkjet
printer |
|
|
|
Demands from the course setters: printing map
and courses together! Scale
1:10000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Selection (of features while other are dropped) |
|
Appropriate
and practicable map content: |
|
What
can be added to greatest advantage and |
|
which
elements have dubious significance for the
purpose of a map (e.g.
rootstocks, fallen trees)? |
|
Specification for Orienteering Maps (ISOM 2000) |
|
|
|
|
|
Classification: individual characteristics
grouped into classes for comprehension and ease of representation |
|
|
|
|
Classification: individual characteristics
grouped into classes for comprehension and ease of representation |
|
|
|
|
|
Simplification: |
|
The various fine structures of natural terrain
can never be fully represented like their reality. |
|
The best principles or rules cannot guide the
hand of the cartographer with certainty |
|
Good simplification needs a lot of geographic
and graphic judgment, as well as a lot of field experience |
|
|
|
|
Simplification: |
|
Line Smoothing (see also contour lines) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contour lines are most import features in the
cartographic representation of a the terrain. |
|
|
|
With contour lines we represent a surface,
therefore we need either: |
|
|
|
hill
shading (not suitable for O-maps) or |
|
a group
of contour lines |
|
|
|
|
|
|
With respect to the contour interval, the
contour lines are too poor in form and smoothed out too greatly |
|
|
|
|
The contour lines show too much detail, too much
activity relative to the large interval |
|
|
|
|
The detail form of the contour lines and the
interval are in good harmony with each other |
|
|
|
|
|
The contour line image should present: |
|
A uniform overall treatment of the terrain,
which is fully interrelated |
|
|
|
Simplify the detailed form of contour and
emphasize and combine large forms |
|
Represent the type of the terrain by emphasizing
breaks in slopes |
|
Represent the terrain an adequate contour line
interval and line width |
|
Provide a certain level of accuracy of the
contour lines and other features |
|
|
|
|
1. A single line says very little; therefore,
one should not draw a single line without considering the line on either
side of it |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2. Small details which are not reflected in
closely neighboring contours should be smoothed out. |
|
|
|
Exceptions: |
|
A small knoll, a small depression or a pit |
|
Flat
terrain |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2. Small details which are not reflected in
closely neighboring contours should be smoothed out. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2. Small details which are not reflected in
closely neighboring contours should be smoothed out. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3. Contour lines should never touch each other,
except in special cases like cliff and rock pillars |
|
|
|
|
4. Generalized contours lines should not look
like gently smoothed wavy lines, neither should appear jagged or crooked |
|
|
|
|
5. Before beginning any generalization of
contour lines, one should draw significant sharply terrain crests or break
of slops as drawing guides lines |
|
|
|
|
|
|